2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 23, 2014, at around 10:20, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that does not lock a FSS5 car parked by the victim C in front of “E” located in Pyeongtaek-si; and (b) stolen it with a hand room of the amount equivalent to KRW 1,20,000,000 in the market value of KRW 1,000 in cash owned by the victim and one mobile phone of the market value of KRW 1,00,000 in the market value.

2. On July 23, 2014, at around 10:20, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim G, with one cigarette equivalent to 2,500 won at the market price owned by the victim, using any cresh in the victim G operated by the victim G in Pyeongtaek-si H, Pyeongtaek-si around July 23, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement G and C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and lecture order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is divided in the course of confession of the crime for sentencing, the amount of damage is not large, the victim G does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant does not have any same criminal power, the defendant's health status is not good, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in determining the punishment as ordered;