If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

At around 14:00 on November 7, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court No. 514, the Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court (Defendant C) on the date of public offering of embezzlement case No. 201Da7402, which was held in the court of Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court No. 514, and testified as follows.

The testimony was prepared on December 1, 2009, at the office of 6th, the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building, the sales contract (the purpose of the sales contract is to determine and sell the G Apartment 117,000 won and the intermediate payment of KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000). At that time, there was a low (the defendant), C (the buyer was acting on behalf of the buyer) and H (H affixed the seal of the representative of E Co., Ltd. on behalf of the seller in the above sales contract) and ② at that time, C lent lent money to the author, and ③ there was a security deposit to sell the money by proxy to H (G apartment's vicarious sale). It was later known that “H was sold to C” (the contract deposit of KRW 20,000,000,000,0000,000).

However, the fact was that there was no mentioning mentioning that the sales contract was made up for KRW 10,00,000 out of the down payment was lent to C, and the fact was investigated by C on February 15, 201 by the investigation agency. The Defendant used KRW 10,000 among the facts that C received KRW 20,000,000 from H. The Defendant would be entitled to deduction from I (sale agency). C’s wife’s husband and wife would not be able to receive us from us. I.).

Thus, even though the defendant was a witness who was aware of the right to refuse to testify by the law, he made a false statement against his memory and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1..