When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-learning automobiles.

On May 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car on May 12, 2015, and led the front road of the Dental in C at the time of Edsan, to the direction from the direction of the intersection.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care, such as driving the steering system, steering system and other devices of the motor vehicle, and driving the motor vehicle according to the structure and performance of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found the victim E (the 74 years old) crossing the road from the left side of the course of the course to the right side of the road, and received the part on the left side of the vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, around May 11, 2015, the Defendant caused the victim to die due to his occupational negligence, such as the long-term transfer of skills and the suspension of cardiopulmonary closure at the Soyang University Hospital located in 158, Seo-gu, Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report, actual condition investigation report, photographs of the scene of the accident, death certificate, autopsy report, and the next red inquiry report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

2. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention in the workhouse is that the Defendant caused the victim to die by occupational negligence as stated in its reasoning, and thus, the illegality thereof is small.

However, the accident occurred because the victim was faced with the above passenger vehicle which was driven at a speed of about 30 km at the road while crossing the vehicle without permission by the signal signal, and the accident occurred. Therefore, the victim was at considerable negligence in the occurrence of the accident or the expansion of damage.