If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. From January 20, 2019, the Defendant, who was living together with the victim B (the age of 39) from January 20, 2019, and was working in the restaurant located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si on February 15:0, 2019, and the Defendant, who was working in the restaurant located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, took a dispute with another woman and Kakakakao Stockholm, and was in his/her possession of the victim, and used the victim’s breath, such as “Pe, cut off, and he/she does not need to do so.”

2. On the same day, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim by cutting off the cell phone used by the said victim in his/her hand at the place under paragraph (1) of the same day so that he/she collected the cell phone from the floor, thereby making the said victim set a gold to the amount of money, thereby damaging the property owned by the said victim.

3. At around 20:21 on the same day, the injured defendant suffered an injury in the number of days of treatment with the victim's arm's length coming from the house where the defendant and the victim living together in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the victim did not open a door to change the identification number of the entrance, thereby cutting down the victim's regular lecture from the entrance to the entrance, cutting down the part of the victim's shoulder by entering the house, shouldering the part of the victim's shoulder into the house, and sustained the victim's arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. photographs of the chief of the complaint, violence against the complainant, and photographs thereof;

1. The complainant's telephone statement and presentation of the victim's photograph [the defendant and his/her defense counsel shall claim that there is no fact that he/she saw the victim's her sloping with her buck or has broken off his/her cellular phone and damaged it, and that part of the crime No. 1 and Paragraph 2 of the crime in the holding are denied. However, according to the above macroscopic evidence, in particular the victim's statements and the cellular phone photographs damaged, the fact that the defendant used his/her cell phone and damaged

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines, respectively.