특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (two years and six months of imprisonment) was too unreasonable. However, each of the crimes of this case was committed again by the Defendant, even though the Defendant had had the history of punishing twice victims under the influence of alcohol driving, who had been punished once the suspension of imprisonment, again committed the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol driving again, without a license, causing traffic accidents, and the driver of the victimized vehicle taken photographs to collect traffic accident-related evidence, and causing injury to him. The nature of the crime is very bad, and the Defendant was arrested at the end of the police’s confising the instant vehicle upon arrival of the police at the accident site, and escaped at a considerable distance, and was arrested at the end of the police’s confiscing. The blood alcohol concentration measured by the Defendant at the time of the instant case was considerably high at 0.191%, and the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the victims at the time of the instant case, and the Defendant did not appear to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendant on June 21, 2018, 2018.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the “C” of the second page 4 of the judgment of the court below shall be deemed “M” and the “H injury diagnosis document” of the third page 19-20 of the judgment of the court below shall be deemed “M”.