집행판결
1. As to the Korea Commercial Arbitration Board case No. 14211-0025, which is an incorporated association between the plaintiffs and the defendant.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. The judgment based on the presumption of confession was delivered to the Seoul Central District Court for the first time, and the main text of Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act [the defendant did not make any assertion other than the defense of violation of jurisdiction (this case was transferred to this Court by the Seoul Central District Court).
A) The enforcement of the arbitral award shall be governed by the judgment of execution by the court, and the arbitral award made in the Republic of Korea shall be enforced unless there is a ground under Article 36(2) of the Arbitration Act (Article 37(1) and Article 38 of the Arbitration Act), and there is no circumstance to deem that there is a ground under Article 36(2) of the Arbitration Act regarding the instant arbitral award, and compulsory execution based on the instant arbitral award must be permitted.