However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, at the Changwon District Court on June 3, 2009, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and on December 1, 2008, at the same court on December 1, 2008, issued a summary order of 700,000 won as a fine for violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On November 15, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.067% of blood alcohol concentration, driven a vehicle B with low alcohol in the section of approximately 1 km from the front of the name straw bus terminal located in the Chang-si Mucompo Sea Movement at Changwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (attached to previous records and copies of judgment, etc.);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant had been subject to punishment twice due to drinking driving, choice of imprisonment is made in consideration of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again, but the defendant has committed the crime of this case by pening his mistake, and the defendant has not committed the crime of this case, and the crime of this case did not occur, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime.