On August 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above bus around 16:05, and proceeded at a speed of about 47 km at a speed of 47 km in the speed of the Central Park from the long-distance bank in the traffic park to the long-distance bank of the city park.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as making a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle well sees the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and operating a steering boat and the brake system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim F (72) who was unclaimed on the right side from the left side of the running direction of the bus without permission by negligence that caused the Defendant to neglect it, but was at the right side of the bus, but did not avoid it, and received the victim as the front side of the front left side of the bus.

At around 20:35 on December 25, 2017, the Defendant had caused the death of the victim with a pactic shock in G convalescent hospital around December 2017.

2. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion did not know in advance that the victim was crossinged without permission due to other vehicles standing on the left-hand side of the bus driving by themselves for signal waiting. However, even though the victim was found to have reached the left-hand side of the bus, it was impossible to avoid the accident because the distance between the bus and the victim is too too difficult.

Therefore, there was no possibility of predicting and avoiding the traffic accident of this case.

3. Determination

A. The evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to predict the traffic accident in this case by the defendant who violated his duty of care when driving a motor vehicle, or by predicting the traffic accident in this case.