However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B (n, 25 years old) 19:00 on the same day through "1 km", which is a string case on February 26, 2020.

2. From the main point of “D” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul to 00:25, the Defendant, at the same day, she drinks alcohol with the victim, and the Defendant, at the same day, found 9 mobile phones jugal gallony jute in the market price of Samsung C owned by the victim.

1. The Defendant of intimidation, around February 27, 2020, sent the Defendant’s photograph to the victim’s cell phone at the Defendant’s residence in Songpa-gu Seoul E on February 27, 2020; on February 26, 2020, the victim sent the Defendant’s photograph to the Plaintiff’s group Kakao Stockholm conference room with her natives who met with the Defendant on February 26, 2020.

I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to spread to the victim that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see I would like to see I would like to Kakaoox as "I would have exceeded her pictures", "I would have exceeded her pictures", "," and "I would like to see."

The body-friendly family members of the camp in “the body” have been examined by the family members of the camp in “the body,” but they show the kind of fash, the year, and the future Fame;

b)the transmission of a message as one of the face was frightening to the victim’s body by spreading the message so that it would have been frighted to the victim’s body.

As such, the Defendant threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 16:37 on February 27, 2020, kept 9 mobile phones in the market value of the victim, at the same location as above, and refused to return the said mobile phone kept by the victim at the request of the victim at around that time.

As such, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the statutes on the details of Kakao conversation between the Defendant and the victim;

1. Relevant Article 355(1) (Embezzlement) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) (Intimidation) of the Criminal Act, and Article 355(1) (Embezzlement), and Article 283 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.