공용물건손상미수등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, and community service for 80 hours in six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the facts leading up to bad sentencing, such as the defendant's age, family relation, circumstance and motive leading up to the crime, and all other factors on the sentencing as indicated in the records and changes in the records of this case, the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate, and there is no change in circumstances to be considered in the trial of this case (the defendant submitted a written agreement with the victim of the crime of damage to property in the first instance, but this is deemed reflected in the sentencing of the court below), and there is no reason to believe that the defendant again submitted a written agreement with the victim of the crime of damage to property in the first instance, which is likely to interfere with the execution of official duties, and there is a family member to support.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.