When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 11, 2017, at around 15:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business in the amount of about 20 minutes, i.e., the victim’s 'D restaurant operated by the victim C’ in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, without any reason, in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the Handling of Home Affairs Reporting ( October 1, 2017) and the 1112 Reporting Act and subordinate statutes on the Handling of Home Affairs Reporting;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the crime committed by the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim, such as, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, the victim’s words “the Defendant is flicker, flicker, flicker,” at least four customers, such as E, etc.

2. This part of the case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the agreement on March 5, 2018, stating the defendant’s intent to revoke the complaint, was submitted. Thus, this part of the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is so decided as per Disposition.