2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the depth thereof, and the fact that the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime is favorable.

However, considering the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., such as the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm, such as the commercialization of women’s sex and the harm to the sound sexual culture, and the establishment of a sound sexual culture, the act of employing foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for engaging in job-seeking activities is also in need of strict punishment as an act that may cause an impediment to the affairs of entry and departure of foreigners. In light of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime and the details of the instant crime, etc., the crime is not good, and there is considerable amount of the establishment of the instant sexual trafficking business, and there is no materials to be considered in the sentencing after the issuance of the lower judgment, and the various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant argument, such as the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the crime, the Defendant’s age, the Defendant’s sexual conduct, and the environment, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.