When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 18, 2016, at around 04:45, the Defendant used the 1112 report of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin Police Station Diplomatic Police Station) on the ground that the slope E belonging to the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Police Station, dispatched after receiving the 112 report of the 112 taxi engineer, she took a bath to E, and she took a bath to E, and she took the face of E from the taxi.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines (excluding the cases where a police officer, who wears a bit uniform, takes into account that the degree of assault is relatively minor, such as that the defendant reflects his/her mistake, and that the police officer does not fit himself/herself, etc., and that the defendant has no criminal record of obstruction of performance of official duties and of punishment exceeding his/her fine for the last ten years);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;