국가유공자요건 및 보훈대상자요건비해당결
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 17, 1996, the Plaintiff joined the Marine Corps and served as the Mad 3 m (3m) Am (81m) Am (8m) for the Marine Corps on June 13, 1996. On June 196, 1996, Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad-5 (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On September 9, 1996, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad 4-5 (hereinafter “the instant injury”). From October 14, 1996 to October 26, 1996, Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad 26, 196.
B. On May 29, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on March 20, 2014, asserting that the instant injury was caused by the instant injury, who was subject to disc-aculing, but was not able to receive shock training during military service, while undergoing shock training, and that the injury was caused by the instant injury.
On July 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the injury and disease of this case does not meet the requirements for persons eligible for veteran's compensation on the ground that the injury and disease of this case revealed symptoms without external wounds which may cause the sacrife of the body of the deceased, the past history of the injury and the record of the medical investigation report was recorded as non-majorly, and it does not constitute the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State on the ground that special treatment, such as surgery, etc., during the service, is not verified, and as a result of the shooting of the computer taken at an external hospital on the water surface, it does not appear to have any opinion on drilling, heat, or glass moving, etc. as a result of the shooting of the computer taken by the outside hospital after the water surface was recorded as a result of the movement in the medical record at the National Armed Forces.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3 evidence, Gap 5-1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was undergoing shock training around June 1996 while serving in the military, and left the wire ropes, and the instant injury or disease occurred, but if the appointed soldiers did so during the training, the Plaintiff was seriously able to receive a match.