(Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court is justifiable even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court is viewed as evidence No. 10 (including the provisional number) submitted by the Plaintiff in this court, and there is no error as alleged by the Plaintiff as the grounds for appeal.

2. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant lent KRW 25 million to the Plaintiff around May 2, 2012, and the Plaintiff did not repay the loan. Accordingly, the Defendant sought payment of the loan.

B. Comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire argument as to the cause of the claim No. 1’s statement, the Plaintiff and C, as of May 2, 2012, borrowed KRW 25 million from the Defendant as of August 30, 2012, with a priority repayment of KRW 5 million, and KRW 20 million as of August 20, 2012, with a separate repayment of KRW 24,000,000,000,000,000 as of KRW 24,000,000,000 each month, may be recognized as having prepared a loan certificate (Evidence No. 1; hereinafter “this case’s loan certificate”; and, in view of the content of the above loan certificate’s loan certificate’s loan certificate’s loan certificate’s loan certificate’s loan, the Plaintiff and the Defendant should be deemed to have the existence of legal act in question, unless it is clear and acceptable to deny its content, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant may have the presumption of its obligation to repay the loan document of this case’s loan.