근로기준법위반등
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who operates C by employing 20 full-time workers in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government B.
The Defendant: (a) from July 8, 2015 to August 17, 2016, the Defendant had not paid KRW 19,313,154 of E’s retirement allowances from around July 1, 2015 to around August 17, 2016, including the total of KRW 9,35,807, bonuses 1,820,00, retirement allowances, KRW 3,048,863, and KRW 14,224,670, and KRW 19,313,154, respectively, of E’s retirement allowances from around August 1, 202 to around September 17, 2013, without agreement on the extension of the payment period between the parties.
2. Articles 109(1), 36, and 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act for the Reasons for Dismissal of Public Prosecution; Article 44 Subparag. 1, 9, and the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act; Article 327 Subparag. 6 of the Criminal Litigation Act (E-E- April 14, 2017; D-based expression of intention not to punish each person on April 17, 2017);