beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.05.09 2013고단2612

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapon, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) were committed by the Defendant in violation of the said Act at the Defendant’s home located in the net City of 16:00 on Nov. 4, 2013. Around the same time as D and D, while drinking alcohol together with D and D while drinking together with the victim E (the age of 47), the said D were caused to have a dispute with D, and the victim had a defect that the victim tried to return to his/her house after his/her removal, and caused the defect that he/she tried to return to his/her house, and threatened the victim by gathering the victim’s face, and threatening the victim by gathering another broom in a broom in a way that fit the victim’s body.

Afterwards, the Defendant demanded the victim to die on board the Poter vehicle owned by the victim, and the Defendant placed stone and insertion, which is a dangerous object in front of the Poter vehicle, in front of the Poter vehicle and the head of the front and the head of the Poter vehicle, and removed the pond by the victim’s side, which is a dangerous object.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as 6 cage cage cage cage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) provides that the Defendant shall threaten the Victim G on November 4, 2013, at the vicinity of the above E’s house located in Net City F around 17:00, on the ground that E did not go to the Defendant, on the ground that E did not go to the Defendant, he sent to the Victim G (V, 45 years old) who is the wife of E (22cm in knife length) and, on the ground that E did not go to the Defendant, he would go to go to the Defendant, and that he would also die not only E but also his family.”