1. The relationship between the parties and the non-party C are legal couples who completed the marriage report on April 21, 1982, and have D and E under the chain.

(See Evidence Nos. 1 to 3-1, 2). 2. The plaintiff and C have two children after marriage, and they have a smooth marriage life.

The plaintiff, while bringing up children after marriage, operated clothes for about 15 years, and is working as a caregiver thereafter.

And C works as the head of the apartment management office.

3. C and the defendant's improper act

A. C was provided with apartment houses as a dormitory by serving as the head of the management office in the old-si F apartment in the old-si city, and at every week, C said that employees and liquors are remaining in the apartment house, and that he was present in the apartment house while drinking and drinking.

B. C has been naturally frequent in the process of living so far (C unilaterally set out that it is imprisony in a gold day) and C has prepared clothes or living tools in the above apartment.

C. At around 2013, C exchanged the Defendant, who is a school alumni, with the word “C”, and love each other via Kax, and the Plaintiff considered this content on C’s mobile phone, thereby having friendlyly reached a dispute.

At the time, C would not meet or communicate again.

After that, C had a fact that he remitted KRW 5 million to the Defendant, but I only waited for the doping that the Plaintiff had lent the money to C as Non-son’s day.

As a result, C does not have any locked with the Plaintiff, and this situation has been continued until now.

As seen above, C had been in an unconditioned manner every week, and C at that time could not enter the company’s house by taking employees and alcohol.