2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). It is recognized that the Defendant confessions and reflects the Defendant, and that the benefits gained in substance are not much.

However, in full view of the various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant was punished for fraud committed while working as a call center counselor at the call center of the host criminal organization, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period, the punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant is not heavier than that of the defendant.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.