도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and forty hours of compliance driving curriculum) is too unreasonable;
2. The judgment is against the defendant's wrong recognition of his/her own mistake, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration level was not significantly high at the time of the crime, etc. However, it is necessary to strictly punish him/her as an offense that may cause serious harm to another person's life and body. The defendant was punished as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around November 201, 201, a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around June 201, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around June 201, and there were other records of punishment for drinking or non-licensed driving over several times, and all the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments in the instant case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. do not seem to be unfair.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.