For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found Defendant B and D guilty of all of the facts charged in this case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court did not err in its judgment by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding “organization or multiple” in the crime of intrusion into a special structure, general traffic obstruction, and common principals.

In this case, the improper sentencing is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

On the other hand, Defendant C did not submit a written reason for appeal within the statutory period, and did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.