If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) went through the road near the south-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was around 1968, the south-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the road near the city bus No. 5413, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business by blocking women’s visitors who were on board the bus, and driving a bridge through the bus, etc.; and (b) upon receiving a report from the victim C (the age of 49) who is a bus engineer, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to leave the bus on the bus; (c) in response, the Defendant failed to comply with the demand; and (d) obstructed the Defendant’s business by preventing the operation of the bus by the victimized person by force for about

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and “the principal and the customer are unable to drive on their wirls.”

’ 라는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울 관악 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경위 E과 순경 F으로 부터 하차할 것을 요구 받게 되자 화가 난다는 이유로 E과 F에게 “ 짭새, 개새끼들” 이라고 욕설하고, 버스에 타고 있는 여자 승객에게 다가가 횡설수설하면서 하차하지 않은 채 버스 운행을 방해하고 있어 피고인을 업무 방해의 현행 범인으로 체포하려 하자 이에 불응하고 반항하며 수갑을 채우려는 F의 우측 엄지손가락을 깨물어 피가 나게 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Examining the circumstances revealed in the record, such as the background leading up to the instant crime, method of commission of the crime, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, whether the Defendant was in a state of mental disorder F and C, and the record reveals that: (a) even though the facts of drinking at the time of the instant crime were recognized, the Defendant was in a state that the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

(b) do not appear.