When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall intrude into an information and communications network without legitimate access authority or beyond the permitted access authority.

Nevertheless, the defendant around October 23, 2013, around 23:02, around the same month, around 09:05, around the same month.

F. 25. 09:16:05, by using a computer installed at the location in C, 201 at the Gu’s residence, and then accessing the D’s website (E) on three occasions by inputting the F’s e-mail account G, and passwords into the information and communications network without due authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The defendant alleged that he had no access to F e-mail account, as stated in its holding, by cutting off the web 6 web-mail connection (Presumption of access to web e-mail), investigation report (the details of user's inquiry about the son's access to the son's access, and the copy of a response document). However, according to the evidence of the court below, the defendant's use of e-mail at around 23:12, Oct. 23, 2013, immediately after the first access as stated in its holding, was recognized, and the defendant used e-mail at the location as stated in its holding at the time. The place of the ruling seems to have no reason for access to the Internet at the above location, and there is no reason for related persons other than the defendant, and it is also possible for the defendant to have access to the e-mail account at the time when the e-mail account was created "G", and the defendant was given with the password at the time when the e-mail account was created.