A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the robbery is acquitted.

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, although the defendant did not have taken the victim's property by force, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On July 16, 2012, around 00:35, the charges charged against this part of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant followed the victim C (the 22 years old), who was going to walk a bicycle on the road above the Hannam-dong 133, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon, and sought to catch and cut a bank with the shoulder of the victim; and (b) the victim gets off and resisted the bank so as not to get off the bank; (c) the Defendant got off the bank so that he could not get off the bank; (d) the Defendant her resistance by cutting off the victim by cutting down the bank so far and cutting it over the floor; and (e) the Defendant her resistance by cutting off the victim’s cash of KRW 20,000,000,000,000, which are owned by the victim.

나. 원심의 판단 원심은 그 판시와 같은 사실 내지 사정들, 즉 ① 이 사건 강도 범행의 범인은 한남육교 노상에서 자전거를 타고 피해자를 뒤따라가서 피해자의 가방을 강취하였는데, 당시 육교 건너편에 있었던 L이 이를 목격하고 위 범행 장소로 달려오는 바람에, 범인이 육교 노상에 자전거를 버린 다음 육교 아래로 난 계단으로 뛰어 내려가 도주하였던 사실(증인 C의 증언, 증거기록 6, 9, 33쪽), ② 이 사건 현장에서 수거된 위 자전거 핸들에서 피고인의 DNA만이 검출되었던 사실(증거기록 17 ~ 19쪽), ③ 피해자는 이 사건 당일 경찰에서 “이 사건 당시 범인의 얼굴을 보았다.”고 하면서, 범인의 외모에 관하여 “30대 초반의 남자로서 보통 체격이고, 얼굴이 하얗고, 밋밋하게 생겼으며, 눈에 쌍꺼풀이 없었다.”고 진술하였고, 이는 피고인의...