국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
1. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant’s chronology No. 12, which was issued to the Plaintiff on June 11, 2015, to the vertebrate 12.
1. Details of disposition;
A. After being appointed as a public official on July 13, 1985, the Plaintiff voluntarily retired on November 20, 2014, filed an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State on November 24, 2014 without disclosing the difference, on the ground that “A traffic accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”) was caused by the operation of a disease control and disinfection vehicle on June 20, 201, and received an operation by satisfying disability and satisfying pain” (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
B. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant confirmed that the applicant’s disease caused by the instant accident was “satise satise and satise chron chrone, and chrone chrone chrone chrone chrone No. 12, 12, and spine chrone 12,” and determined that the symptoms do not remain temporary and disability, and that a proximate causal relationship is difficult between the person who rendered distinguished services to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship with the person who rendered distinguished services to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation, in
hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"
2) 【Fact-finding without dispute over the ground for recognition, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-1, and Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s assertion occurred when operating disinfection vehicles to prevent infectious diseases, such as public health care and eradication of pests, etc. after the accident of this case, the symptoms, such as the occurrence of ebrate spathral disorder, etc. caused by the vertebrate spathy, etc. after the accident of this case, and the accident of this case occurred while operating disinfection vehicles for the purpose of preventing infectious diseases, such as the protection of public health and eradication of pests, etc., the injury of this case constitutes a person of distinguished service to the State since it occurred due to the occurrence of occupational duties directly related to the protection of people’s life and property (the prevention of spread of infectious diseases)
(b) Oral arguments are made in the statements in Gap evidence No. 1.