However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant: (a) received and retained a e-mail card delivered at each of the entire regions in accordance with the direction of the names of the indivists (one name “D” and “E”; (b) received money from the victims through the crime of the e-mail “Sphishing,” and received money from the victims to the account connected to the above e-mail card, and transferred the money to the account designated by the indivists, under the direction of the indivists; and (c) received 150,000 won per day from the indivists.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall keep, deliver or distribute access media with the knowledge that such media is to be used for a crime or to be used for a crime;

around 23 08:50 on February 23, 2017, the Defendant kept 42 Gangseo-gu, Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 20-ro, 42, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, 20-ro, and 5-ro gate-based, female-based, female-based, located at the same time under the orders of the above-mentioned persons without any name, (G), F corporate bank accounts (H), (H), (J), and (iv) Han Bank accounts (J), and (L), and (e) collect and keep four copies of the check cards each connected to the K bank accounts (L) from February 22, 2017.

2. Until December 24, 200, the Defendant received and kept a total of 13 physical cards by delivery, such as the list of offenses in the attached sheet.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with a person without name, kept a total of 13 approaching media for the purpose of using it for the crime of “singing”.

2. On February 23, 2017, the person who was unaware of the name of aiding and abetting fraud calls the victim M at an influence place, and “The fluents and flusss and fluss and fluss and fluss and flusss and fluss and fluss and guarantees

If you send KRW 20,000,000 to the head of the party, you do not have only the children.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

In fact, however, there was no occurrence guarantee or contact with a person who was not the victim's name.

A person with no name shall be named above.