도로법위반
The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.
1. A, who is an employee of the Defendant, operated a vehicle of the Defendant with gross weight of 44.54 tons, in violation of the restriction on operation of a vehicle exceeding 40 tons in front of the red autopsy in front of the 100 Jeju Port Don 100-dong, Incheon at around March 17, 1994, by violating the restriction on operation of a vehicle exceeding 40 tons.
2. Determination and conclusion, the effect of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2012Hun-Ga18, Oct. 25, 2012 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged. Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a case not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.