When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 9, 2017, the Defendant, at around 19:00, expressed the victim C (n, 46 years of age)’s “D restaurant” operated by the Da-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, without any justifiable reason, walking the table with a stringing the table, leaving the string to the floor of the string, leaving the strings on the strings, and continuously going against E (n, 50 years of age) who is an employee of the above restaurant, the Defendant expressed the desire to “I am this string, I bit bit B, I bit B, I am bit B, I am bit B, I am bit B, and I am am son B at around 19:15 on the same day. On the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bucking of the victim’s buck in one time, and caused some customers to interfere with the eating of some customers, and calculated them.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim C's restaurant business by force.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 9. 9. 19:21 경 위 ‘D’ 음식점에서 소란을 피우던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 음성 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경찰 관인 순경 G 등으로부터 현행범인 체포를 당하게 되었고, 위 순경 G 등과 함께 경찰차량으로 이동하던 중 갑자기 “ 야 이 씹새끼야. 휴대폰 어디 있어. ”라고 소리를 지르며 발로 G의 좌측 허벅지와 우측 허벅지를 각 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G, E, and C;

1. Each written statement of C, E, and H;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a case, such as interfering with official duties;

1. Relevant photographs, such as interfering with the performance of public duties reported;

1. Image images and images of CCTV crimes;

1. Report of investigation (as to the 112-Report records, the application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV-related crimes);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of fines (the crime of this case was committed by the defendant too much much in food values at the restaurant;

The remainder, in the process of a port of call, shall be the only one in which they are drunk.