강제추행등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
The gist of the prosecutor's appeal (unfair sentencing) of the crime of this case was that the defendant escaped by using the vehicle after the victim F and G, who committed an indecent act against the victim E and F and prevented them from doing so under the influence of alcohol at a restaurant, and caused a traffic accident while driving the vehicle at a dangerous level, according to the trend, it is not very good that the police officer did not comply with the request for a reasonable drinking measurement while driving the vehicle, and the defendant did not have an attitude against the defendant's mistake. In light of the fact that the victims of the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents did not recover from damage, and the victims want to have a serious punishment against the defendant, it is unfair that the court below's sentence that ordered the suspension of the execution of the sentence of 2 years and 40 hours of sexual assault training in August is too uneased.
Judgment
The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, committed each of the crimes of this case by wrong entry into a restaurant where the victims are suffering from the victims, and committed all of the mistakes, and against it. The crime of indecent conduct of this case by force of this case is relatively minor that the Defendant f, E's arms and shoulders the victim 80 years old, and the victims paid 1,350,000 won as compensation for damages caused by the Defendant on October 28, 2015. The victims received 1,350,000 won as compensation for the crime of indecent conduct and bodily injury of this case, and it was necessary to enter into a civil agreement with the insurance company with regard to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and thus, expressed the intention to “the victim G of the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, E was paid insurance money from the insurance company, there was no record of criminal punishment by the Defendant for age of 80 years old, the Defendant's age, the background, motive, circumstances, etc.