beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.06.30 2016고단389

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 18:10 on March 18, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 389, 2016,” opened at the “D” coffee shop operated by the victim C (W, 59 years old) located in Gumi-si B, 2016, followed up approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance from the time when the victim took a large amount of desire for the victim, and opened the chair and the table on the floor, thereby leaving the customers at the said coffee shop.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the coffee shop business of the victimized party by force.

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report that “I will not drink alcohol and make a cab free of charge”; (b) I will not file a complaint against I; (c) I will not see I am on the ground that I am son and I am son, I am son, and I am son on the ground that I am son, I am am son, I am son, and I am am son on the front of the F pharmacy in Gu-si, Si-si; and (d) on the 112 report that “I am son and I am son.”

“Ching the bat,” the bat of the H’s bat and fat, the bat of the bat of the bat, the right shoulder was 3 to 4 times in hand, the bat of the bat of the bat, the bat of the bat of the H, the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat, and

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 389"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. "Report on internal investigation (limited to attachment of photographs) 2016 Height 515;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Reasons for sentencing of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes committed by a violation of heavier business affairs);

1. Imprisonment with prison labor for a range of applicable sentences under the law from January to June 2.