2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant are the family members of the network A (the deceased on September 19, 2015, which was after the instant lawsuit was filed; hereinafter “the deceased”).

Plaintiff

B is the deceased’s spouse, and as the deceased’s child, ① the deceased’s child (the deceased on January 11, 2009 and his heir died) and his spouse E, children C, D, and F), ② the Defendant, ③ the Plaintiff G, ④ the Plaintiff H, 5 M, and 6 Plaintiff I.

B. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant: (a) concluded a loan agreement with the State around 1960 with respect to the land size of 225 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”); and (b) set up an unauthorized building on the ground.

The Deceased’s place of death was called “P” as an island in the south of theO, and the Deceased was sent to a lifelong language book.

In 2013, as a result of the closure of fisheries in a local political zone due to the emission of hot water by the Bohman power plant, the deceased was able to receive a fishery compensation from the Korea Medium & Power Development Corporation (272,431,500 won was determined in 2015), and the deceased left Plaintiff H, who was a member of the fishery right, as a matter of gift tax, etc.

There is a dispute between the deceased's children in relation to the distribution of compensation.

C. The deceased owned 426 square meters prior to K in Boh-si, Boh-si, where the instant donation was in contact with the instant site (hereinafter “former Before the instant case”). The deceased donated the said land to the Defendant on March 11, 2014.

The Defendant applied for the registration of ownership transfer before the instant case, but was ordered by the competent registry office on March 18, 2014 to supplement the qualification certificate for acquisition of farmland.

The Defendant immediately applied for the qualification certificate for acquisition of farmland, but the application was rejected on the ground that the former was unlawfully altered due to the death of the Deceased on the site of this case, which was linked to the previous record of this case.

The plaintiff entered into a contract with the architect office to foster the deceased's housing.

As to the site of this case.