However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2, 2019, at around 14:45, the Defendant reported to the effect that a drunk person would escape a disturbance before the members of Ansan-si, and received a report to the effect that he was forced to do so, the Defendant d's snow part of drinking with a person who was a police officer belonging to the Ansan-si Police Station C district Police Station of the Ansan-si, and obstructed a public official's legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Determination of Punishment] : Type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties/Performance of Duties) [Determination of Recommendation Area] Basic Area / [Scope of Recommendation Area] / [general person] from June to one year and six months / [No criminal records of mitigation element / [Determination of Sentence ] The above sentencing factors and the defendant did not have any criminal records of criminal punishment / The above sentencing factors and the defendant recognized their mistakes, while taking into account all the circumstances, including the fact that the types of