beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2018.10.12 2018고단269

특수폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended sentence for fraud, etc., but the suspended sentence was revoked on August 20, 2017, and the Seoul Eastern Detention Center completed the execution of the sentence on August 20, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was parked in front of the YG car in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant was requested to move the vehicle from the victim D ( South, 59 years old) to obstruct the passage of other vehicles; and (b) even though he was aware that the victim was going on the front of the said vehicle, he was aware of the fact that the victim was driving on the front of the said vehicle, and was aware of the fact that the victim was driving on the front of the said vehicle, and received the part of the victim’s buckbucks as part of the front part of the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim with a car, which is a dangerous object.

2. On April 26, 2018, from around 18:15 to April 21:15, 2018, the Defendant interfered with general traffic by leaving one motor vehicle XG car parking on a one-way road set of the preceding paragraph at approximately 2.5 meters in width of the front road E-ray, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun, in the width of the road.

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for a violation of road traffic law in the credit support by means of the source of water source, which was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on September 2, 2016, and the suspended sentence was revoked on June 12, 2017, and the suspended sentence was terminated on August 20, 2017 at the detention center of the Seoul Eastern District Court.

[2] On January 23, 2018, at around 02:00, the Defendant ordered food as if he did not have a means to pay the food price and would have paid the food price to the victim even though he did not have an intent or ability to pay the food price. The Defendant received from the victim the delivery of KRW 36,00, 100, 200, 200, 36,000, 200.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to take property.