If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 19:40 on the 16th day of November, 2016, and proceeded with the intersection of the luxung-dong, Busan at the luxung-dong, Pluxung-dong, Busan to the euthande-dong.

Since there is an intersection where traffic control is performed, there was a duty of care to accurately operate the steering and steering gear and to prevent accidents by driving at a safe speed and in a safe manner according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision on the left-hand side of the victim D(71) driving, which was left-hand in accordance with the new subparagraph, from the room of the Madin Madin Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Ka

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by its occupational negligence, approximately two weeks of injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., and around three weeks of injury to the victim F (54 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each traffic accident statement (10,37 pages of investigation records);

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) and photographs (12, 13, 14 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It takes into account the following circumstances: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant’s violation of the duty of care due to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less vulnerable to the degree of the Defendant’s violation of the duty of care due to the operation of the Defendant; and that the victims suffered from the injury of KRW 2 weeks and KRW