The Defendant, around July 201, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government office, tried to conduct aggregate extraction business (hereinafter referred to as “instant business”) from the Gangwon-do office to the victim D-type E (hereinafter referred to as “F”) at the Seocho-gu office, Seocho-gu, Seoul. Around September 201, the Defendant actually completed the procedure for authorization and permission, and if only the authorization and permission has been reduced, the amount of 10 billion won can be raised sufficiently. However, since some additional funds are required for authorization and permission, 50 million won will be contributed to 5% of the F shares if the investment would be made. Even if the business was erroneous, the Defendant would return the principal to the victim by December 31, 2011, and on September 20, 2011, it would be necessary to return the additional funds to the Jeju Regional Office by 10% if all the procedures for authorization and permission for aggregate extraction were to be completed.

However, as a result of examining the site of the business site in which the defendant started, F's aggregate extraction project was at issue, and part of the project was at the permanent state forest. On October 21, 2010, the submission of supplementary materials for environmental impact assessment was notified from the forest green belt and the forest green belt on March 21, 2010 and the submission of supplementary materials for environmental impact assessment was demanded four times from March 15, 2010, but the above project was not in fact carried out, such as failure to comply with the demand, and there was no intent or ability to reduce the company's shares after obtaining the approval or permission of the aggregate extraction project, such as the promise, from the victim.

In addition, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, he shall bear most of the money, not for business purposes.