beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.04.18 2012고단1032

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing2 car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act (unauthorized Driving).

On November 22, 2012, at around 17:50, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without a driver's license, and turned the three-lane road in front of the Gangseo Labor District Office located in the Gangnam Labor District of Gangseo-si, the Defendant changed the two-lanes into the two-lanes while driving the three-lane road from the jurisdiction of the Gangseo Medical Center to the intersection of the valley in the valley of the city.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to give advance notice of change of course by operating direction direction, etc. and to change the lane in the situation of traffic in the front and rear left.

The Defendant neglected this and got a two-lane to turn to the left at an intersection located on the front side by changing the two-lanes to the left side, and went to the right side of the victim D (the 53-year-old 53-year-old Round) driving, which was going to the front side of the EFetetetet No. 2 vehicle driving by the Defendant, and got the victim F (the 47-year-old 19-year-old lap), who took the part above D and damaged vehicle, and got the victim G (the 19-year-old lap), to take the clocks and the tensions of the need for treatment for about 2 weeks, and even if the damaged vehicle had a department to get the 2,026,757 won of the repair cost, such as the exchange of the latter moth, and failed to stop immediately and escape without taking measures such as aiding the victims.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said rocketing2 car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and at the same place as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A traffic accident report (1), (2);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Three copies of a medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;