Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and two months.

evidence of seizure.

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court against Defendant A (two years of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below against Defendant B (one year of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

C. The punishment sentenced by the lower court against Defendant C (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Each of the above types of punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendants is unfair.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing against Defendant A and the prosecutor’s each of the charges on the assertion of unfair sentencing was made in the trial, and the part denied by the court below was divided in depth, and the Defendant A was the first offender who has no criminal power at all, and had his wife and his wife support his or her married, and it appears to have committed each of the crimes of this case. Defendant A’s mother was aware that he or she had committed the crime of this case, and Defendant A was able to take the Defendant’s guidance, and the Defendant A expressed his or her intention not to be punished by Defendant A with only I among the victims of each of the fraud crimes of this case at the trial. Although there were circumstances such as 4.9 million won among the money acquired by Defendant A, Defendant A was delivered to the victim S, Defendant A was compensated for damages to the victims other than the victim, and Defendant A did not receive the money from the victim’s remaining victims in the process of receiving the money from his or her organization fraud, the so-called “the bank account of this case,” in collusion, etc.