Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay at the rate of 24% per annum from August 9, 2014 to the date of full payment, with respect to the remainder of KRW 16,696,601, and the remainder of KRW 15,37,511, excluding damages for delay, due to the termination of the lease agreement entered in the attached Form column for the cause of claim (hereinafter “the lease agreement of this case”).

As to this, the defendant argued to the effect that the above claim by the plaintiff is unjustifiable since he did not receive the leased vehicle (hereinafter "the leased vehicle of this case") after the conclusion of the lease contract of this case, the defendant was delivered the leased vehicle of this case through D on March 6, 2013, and after the delivery of the leased vehicle of this case to the defendant through the above B, etc., as long as the leased vehicle of this case was delivered to the defendant through B, etc. under the business relationship between B and the defendant, as long as the leased vehicle of this case was delivered to the defendant through the above business relationship between B, etc., the above facts of recognition do not require separate settlement between the defendant and the defendant as to the issue arising from the actual operation of the leased vehicle of this case and the loss. Thus, the defendant cannot accept the above argument by the defendant, at least, since the defendant cannot be obliged to pay the plaintiff a debt under the lease contract of this case.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.