When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 2, 2009, the Defendant: (a) was asked to borrow money from E in order to forge F’s lease agreement; (b) was used with black fences on the paper of the real estate lease contract owned by E; (c) “Seoul-do Sungnam-si G” in the face column, “Seoul-do Sungnam-si G” in the lease deposit column; and (d) on the date date column, “F, H, I, I, lessee column, E, and K arbitrarily stated the F’s seal attached to E in advance on the name of the above F name; and (c) on the same day, E loaned money to the victim under the name of NN company in the operation of the victim in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Seoul-si; and (c) borrowed money to the victim in the real estate lease contract form established in the real estate lease contract form.”

It is necessary to pay KRW 2 million with the purchase cost of goods, and if it is lent, 24,00 won shall be paid every day by 100 days.

‘Falsely speaking, it was received from the victim i.e., 1840,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above E, uses one copy of the F name lease contract without authority for the purpose of exercising the above E, and acquired 1840,000 won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on real estate lease contracts (E);

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;