However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who has been married with I on November 22, 1983.

On October 5, 2013, around 10:30 on October 10, 2013, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with B and once with B in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, with a total of seven times from that time until November 16, 2013, and had sexual intercourse with B and had been aware that he/she was a spouse of B.

2. Defendant B is a person who has completed a marriage report with L on February 2, 2010.

On October 5, 2013, around 10:30 on October 10, 2013, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A at least seven times in total from the time until November 16, 2013, and had sexual intercourse with A, even though he/she was aware that he/she was his/her spouse, as described in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness L and B;

1. Each police statement made to L/I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on a complaint filed for L/I preparation;

1. In full view of the following facts: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act (the main sentence) and the second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act (the first sentence of Article 241(1) for criminal facts; the defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that he was raped by occupational force on the part of the defendant A; however, although the defendant B asserted that he was sexual intercourse with the defendant A, the defendant B prepared a written confirmation that he was sexual intercourse with the defendant A and delivered it to his husband; the defendant B recognized both the relationship between the defendant B and the investigative agency; and the defendants B recognized both the relationship between the defendant B and the investigative agency; and the fact that the defendants are in a relationship with the

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following grounds for sentencing) 1.