If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant was aware that the defendant was constantly talked with the victim C, and the defendant was forced from time to time to time to call the victim so as not to meet B, but did not intend to meet the meaning.

The defendant from around 09:13 on September 4, 2012 to the same month.

6. From 11:05 to 12 times, the Defendant’s cell phone (D) sent a text message stating that “this Chewing spawn is dead,” using the victim’s cell phone (E) to the victim’s handphones, and from that moment, the Defendant’s repeated arrival of codes and words causing fears or apprehensions over 12 times in total, such as the contents in the annexed crime sight table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the mail contents of the complaint, recording book, and Handphones carried by the suspect to the victim;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and Articles 44-7 (1) 3 and 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;