beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.30 2015나106

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for damages caused by the Plaintiff since the Plaintiff made a false broadcast, which was stolen or robberyed by a third party on December 2013, and damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant sent a broadcast of the above content, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

In addition, the plaintiff accepted his house around 2008, and it was erroneous that dust was generated in the course of house repair.

Although the defendant could not make a broadcast on the problem of house repair dust, he asserts that he is responsible for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiff because he damaged the plaintiff's reputation by broadcasting the problem of house repair dust, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant sent the above contents, and therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.