beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고합79

강도상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced by the Jeju District Court to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence on January 25, 2013 at the Jeju Prison on January 25, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 18, 2013, the Defendant injured the robbery by robbery: (a) was boarding a D taxi driven by the injured party C (hereinafter “instant taxi”) on the street while moving from Jeju City on the street on April 18, 2013 at KRW 00:35 on the same day; and (b) was passing about 2852 prior to the 2852nd from Jeju City, Jeju; (c) the Defendant raised a dispute over the problem of taxi charges with the victim on one occasion with a view to avoiding the payment of taxi charges; (d) the victim was driving the said taxi on one occasion with the victim’s head aboard who gets off the said taxi while driving the said taxi while leaving the said taxi on the driver’s seat at Jeju; (e) the victim got the victim into the right side of the taxi by driving the said taxi; and (e) the victim was taking advantage of the victim’s interest in property, 3,000 won and 2,000 won of the said taxi; and (e) the victim was taking advantage of the market price of the said taxi.

2. On April 18, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal of measurement) (e., refusal of measurement) was investigated by the F police box located in E at Jeju on April 18, 2013 by the case described in paragraph (1), and the Defendant was deemed to have considerable grounds to suspect that he was under the influence of alcohol due to a large amount of smelling in the inside of the police box and the normal level of speech and behavior, and was requested by G, etc. from the process belonging to the above police station, but failed to comply with the request

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The list of video records of booms in this Court.