When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall make a false labelling with respect to the names, manufacturing methods, quality, nutrition labelling, nutrition values, raw materials, ingredients, uses, etc. of foods, etc., and no one shall make a false labelling with regard to the false labelling in indicating the date of production or the expiration date of distribution.

Nevertheless, around July 24, 2013, the Defendant subdivided the date of manufacture into the “C”, which is operated by the Defendant in Yasan-si B, into the “C” on November 15, 2012, and marked the date of manufacture into the packaging on July 24, 2013, and marked the date of manufacture into the packaging on July 31, 2013, and marked the date of manufacture on the packaging on November 15, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements and certifications of E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the product mark whose date of manufacture is changed, and the date of manufacture of the original product;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 1 of the former Food Sanitation Act (amended by Act No. 11986, Jul. 30, 2013) and Article 13 (1) of the same Act (amended by Act No. 11986, Jul. 30, 2013);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;