Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On April 19, 2016, the Defendant, as professor of C University D, sent a text message to the Defendant that I, a professor of C University, sent the Defendant to the Defendant at the victim’s seat while drinking together with G and Cho (28 years of age) of the same department leader G and Cho (hereinafter referred to as C University D, on April 19, 2016, the Defendant told the Defendant, who was a professor of C University D, of the same department leader, followed the Defendant’s sending of text message containing the Defendant to the victim. As the Defendant stated, I would like to read, “I am me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me she pas

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement and police officer's statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as regards the statement of the Ferman);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of a sentence like the order of a provisional payment order by taking into account the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the contents of the defendant's crime are not good for sentencing reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime, and the absence of any criminal records, and other conditions