2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected the mistake, and that the amount of damage to the instant crime is relatively minor.

However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime was committed in a scambling manner, and assaulting the Victim G while obstructing the victim J’s main business; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on several occasions for the same kind of crime on February 10, 2015; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime on May 12, 2015, even if he/she had been committed for repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed on May 12, 2015; and (d) there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment was rendered; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime was committed, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.