However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 04:20 on October 18, 2013, the Defendant heard the victim E in front of the D Hospital located in Hanam-si, about five times to drink the victim’s face, and obstructed the victim’s head head head head, who resists the victim’s head from the glass in the vehicle, and obstructed the victim’s face to conflict with the victim’s head, and then, the Defendant saw the victim’s face into several times to drink the victim’s face and taken the victim’s face into drinking. In short, the Defendant inflicted an injury, such as defrising the victim’s body that needs to be treated for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a petition;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are not weak for the reason of sentencing, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the accused is committed and the victim does not want the punishment against the accused, etc.;