On December 28, 2016, the Defendant was a person appointed as the president of the council for the representatives of occupants of the above apartment complex in Cheongju-si. On October 17, 2016, E, etc., the relocating representative of the above apartment complex, was dismissed from the Dong representative on October 17, 2016, the Defendant filed a lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the resolution for the dismissal of the representative on his/her behalf with the Cheongju District Court on November 2, 2016, and is currently in trial.

On January 16, 2017, the Defendant wishes to actively cooperate in the construction of "Fresh Economic Cheongju, such as Japan," and to make an audit with the chief Justice, and to contribute to the rapid development of your complex, as the title "Arresh (D) notification of acceptance of a report on the establishment of a representative meeting of occupants" from Cheongju viewing on or around January 16, 201.

2. With respect to the case on which the organization of the conference for the representatives of the occupants of the Cheongju-si D Apartment-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (the change) has been reported, it shall be known that the report has been accepted as follows pursuant to Article 19 of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act and Article 21 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act and shall be based on the vision for the management of the

3. However, D.O.O.O.T.T.T.D.O.T.T.D.O.T.T.T.T.T.D.T.D.

Upon receipt of the official document stating "," the Defendant, without any restriction, intended to delete 3 clauses of the proviso to the above official questioning in order to inform the occupants of the apartment as if he/she were accepted as the chairperson of the representative meeting of occupants.

The Defendant, on January 17, 2017, at the printing office located adjacent to the G A/S Center located adjacent to the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, without authority, to exercise his/her name in the printing office “3. However, the Defendant, without authority, notified that any change may be made in the future according to the outcome of the action to confirm the invalidity of the resolution of dismissal in progress.”

The phrase “after deleting the word “the size of letters referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the official document” is required to be deleted, and the said employee’s deletion is made in the name of the Cheongju Market.