2. Defendant B is the above fine.

While anyone is not allowed to exchange, arrange for money exchange or repurchase the results obtained through the use of the game product, the defendant A installed 50 sponss and 28 sponss on the third floor of the Gu-si building C, and operated the "D Game Center", the settlement and overall management of the game room, and the defendant B conspiredd to issue sponss to customers while managing the above game room.

From the beginning of March 2013 to April 25, 2013, the Defendants issued 10,000 points that many unspecified customers acquired through the use of the said game in the said game room, and upon the request of the said customers, exchanged the remaining points in cash after deducting 10% of the points from the fee.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Defendant A who will choose a sentence of imprisonment: Defendant B: The choice of a fine (the degree of participation in the crime and the absence of the same criminal record);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 62 (1) of the same Act; Article 62 (1)

1. Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;