beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.29 2014고합500

공직선거법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

To order the defendant to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although there is no assault or threat on a candidate who wishes to be a candidate with respect to the election of 2014 High 500 "," the Defendant saw that the victim P (W, 46 years old) who is the proportional representative of the O basic members in connection with the election of the 6th National Dong-si local government around May 31, 2014 is a head of an illegal election campaign, and taken the name of the candidate from the victim by misunderstanding that it is a head of a place where the victim P (W, 46 years old) who is the proportional representative of the O basic members in connection with the election of the 6th National Dong-si local government.

The Defendant assaulted the victim’s neck, which was dried up in front of the entrance of subway N 2, such as displaying the victim’s neck on his hand and cutting it over to the bend, displaying the victim’s upper half of the frame, and then put the victim into a base of cryp, etc. which requires two weeks of medical treatment.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a candidate in an election.

"2015 Gohap25"

1. On October 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on Q, the Defendant: (b) under the influence of alcohol to the Victim S(s) (i) who loaded goods with the R convenience points in front of the R convenience store located in Q, and (ii) without any justifiable reason, carried out “Is the following years: (i) whether Is age several times, and (ii) whether Is age 20; (iii) “Is the year during which Is age ; (iv) Is the year during which Is the end of the year; (iv) if Is the year during which Is age 1, I expressed his desire to “Is the Victim’s right upper part of the chest part of the Victim’s right by hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. On October 19, 2014, around 00:40 on October 19, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and (b) the police officers, V, etc. belonging to the Udistrict, who called up after receiving a report on the act of paragraph (1) prior to the access point located adjacent to the access point under paragraph (1) and arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, thereby having the Defendant boarding the Defendant on the 112 patrol vehicle in the document where he stopped at that place; (c) the Defendant refused it; (d) the Defendant displayed both descendants while refusing it; and (e) the part on the back of the patrol vehicle’s right side, even if even though even with the back of the patrol vehicle’s back,

In this respect.